CENTRO-COMPLEXIFICATION
Those
who understand little about theocracy oppose
The
centripetal principle of centro-complexification
With
the centrifugal principle of decentralization,
Commensurate
with the degeneration of politics
From
communist and/or liberal to radical Marxist levels,
And the furtherance of participatory democracy.
Instead
of encouraging an evolutionary progression
From
the Many to the Few or, preferably, the One,
Such
political degenerates favour
A
devolutionary regression from the Few to the Many,
The
centre to the periphery, which is to say, from
Government to themselves, politicians to people.
Little
do they realize what degree of chaos
This
would engender, though the poet W.B. Yeats
Had
some inkling of it when, in The Second Coming,
He
wrote of 'Mere anarchy' being 'loosed upon the world'
In
consequence of things falling apart from 'the centre',
The
sort of situation that would doubtless appeal to
An
undisciplined mob, but hardly to men of good sense!
And
yet, the 'centre' to which Yeats was alluding in
The
above-mentioned poem wasn't the ultimate Centre,
Identified
by me with Social Transcendentalism,
But,
rather, a bourgeois democratic one,
And
it is perhaps inevitable that before
A
new and higher centre can be created,
The
old one has to be undermined
Through
centrifugal action, in accordance with
The
oscillatory and relative progression of
Evolution towards a more absolutist goal.
What
one must ensure is that such centrifugal action
Doesn't
get completely out-of-hand,
Else
it may become its own master
And
not the unconscious servant of a superior end!
For,
eventually, there must be a new centripetal principle,
Leading
to the utmost centro-complexification of
A
civilization superior, in every respect, to
The
previous one, a truly theocratic civilization,
In
which sovereignty is vested in the Centre,
In
the person of the Leader, who becomes
The
executive hub around which the various
Administrative
departments of government
Revolve,
in deference to his overall will.
In
such a civilization, there can be only
One
leader, one party, and one people - namely,
The
people capable of theocratic upgrading
And
allegiance; though, eventually, there is no reason
Why
other such peoples shouldn't come under
A
similar system within a supra-national framework of
Uniform
ideological identification, so that
Centro-complexification goes ahead
On
a world-wide basis under the aegis of
A unified regulatory body.
We
cannot, in this overly nationalistic age, expect
Much progress towards supra-national unity just yet.
But
we can certainly look towards a time
When,
with the development of a more
Transcendent
consciousness, nations draw closer to
That
ultimate centro-complexification of global unity
In the most radical theocratic allegiance.